Second Quarter, 2006
              Putin speaks:
              
                
                  "Russia’s reserves of oil and gas are bigger by   four times than those of all [the other] G-8* countries added together. So how   can one solve energy issues without involving Russia, and how can one speak   about ensuring global world security issues without account of Russia’s   position, which is one of the strongest nuclear powers?"
                  * (The "G-8" is comprised of the following   countries: Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, United Kingdom and the   U.S.)
                
              
              So spoke Russian President Vladimir Putin   recently. Putin knows he is in the driver’s seat vis-à-vis Russia’s neighbors in   both Eastern and Western Europe, and now he wants that message clearly and   unambiguously understood by the U.S., and most specifically, by President   Bush.
              
                
                  Quoting from the Wall Street Journal, "In   May, Vice President Dick Cheney accused Russia of using its vast oil reserves as   "tools of intimidation and blackmail." On Wednesday, Mr. Putin shot back that   Mr. Cheney’s criticism was merely "an unsuccessful hunting shot", a reference to   the vice president’s accidental shooting of a friend while duck hunting earlier   this year."
                
              
              Putin’s response speaks volumes about Russia’s   present view of the world, and of the U.S. in particular. He saw no need to deny   the accusations, or get defensive about his country’s theft of Yukos Oil Company   or about curtailment of domestic freedoms. Instead he simply chose to ridicule   the Vice President. A new reality appears to be in the making -  that the U.S.   needs Russia’s good will in this day and age a lot more than Russia needs ours.   According to Institutional Investor magazine (July, 2006),
              
                
                  "Putin’s approval ratings still hover around 70   percent, the envy of any G-8 counterpart, and six Russians in ten would welcome   an amendment of the constitution to enable him to serve a third term after his   current one expires in March 2007, according to a June poll by the Moscow-based   Levada Center."
                
              
              Russia is experiencing massive inflows to its   foreign currency reserves from natural resource sales and is now in the process   of paying off all of its foreign debt. The U.S., at the same time, continues to   spend wildly beyond its means on unaffordable social programs and foreign wars,   making us ever more beholden to foreigners for the purchase of our growing debt.   From a big-picture perspective, it’s worth keeping in mind the old investment   maxim: "Follow the money."
              Russia believes the ruble should eventually become   a world reserve currency, thereby competing with the dollar and, of late, the   Euro for that status. Bloomberg news reports that Russia plans to create a   universal symbol for the ruble akin to the "$" denoting the dollar. Competition   of this type normally means that the price of the item in question gradually   declines while its yield is forced higher by the action of the marketplace.   Lehman Brothers recently issued a report in which it stated that Central Banks   around the world reduced their allocation of dollars in their reserves during   the past year from a 72% average to 68%. Thus, even though the Fed may soon be   at the end of its interest raising efforts, global currency cross currents and   eddies could overwhelm the Federal Reserve’s efforts to control the direction of   interest rates in the future.
              What all this discussion is leading up to is that   we continue to believe that the domestic stock market may remain "unsettled" for   the foreseeable future, and that domestic interest rates may continue to rise   for a longer period of time relative to today’s consensus view that rate   increases are nearing an end in the present cycle.
              Our investment posture continues to call for being   overexposed to energy stocks, precious metals and other commodity plays. We   continue to remain relatively short term in our bond holdings (one- to five-year   maturities), and we continue to maintain significant levels of exposure to   non-U.S. securities markets for both debt and equity investments.
              The U.S. Treasury yield curve has once again   become inverted. As discussed in previous quarterly letters, this type of   occurrence illustrates the bond market’s view that our economy will weaken in   the next 3-6 months. In fact, evidence of an economic slowdown continues to   mount at this time, adding further credence to the predictive nature of the   inversion indicator.
              Against this backdrop of mostly unpleasant news is   the fact that equity valuations continue to gradually become more attractive.   This trend towards more favorable equity valuations is occurring because   corporate earnings have maintained a healthy rate of growth while stock prices overall continue to languish.
              We tend to get excited when we find high-quality   stocks with good dividend yields selling at attractive valuations, and that is   precisely what the present investment environment is beginning to reveal on our   investment radar screens. Valuation is a different metric for stock investing   compared to searching for companies having strong short- to intermediate-term   earnings growth potential. While it’s true that we would like to have both (as   in having your cake and eating it too), we think attractive valuations and high   levels of dividend yields are more important to long-term wealth accumulation   than is the purchase of high-priced shares of a company on a rapid growth rate   trajectory paying little or none of its earnings in the form of   dividends.
              In the second quarter, the best performing equity   markets were Slovenia and Cyprus, countries about which, we admit, we have   fairly limited knowledge. Virtually every other equity market, both foreign and   domestic, experienced losses during the quarter. In addition, our bond markets   also experienced losses for the quarter as interest rates generally increased by   approximately 30 basis points along most of the yield curve.
              The unsettled and volatile nature of the overall   stock markets as mentioned above has led us to engage in a modest degree of   hedging activity in client portfolios. The purpose of a "hedge" is to reduce   (but not eliminate) the magnitude of possible losses in portfolios if markets   begin a significant downturn. The hedging instrument can be either a put or a   call contract, each being a different means towards similar ends: loss   reduction. A put contract can be compared to the purchase of an insurance policy   for which a premium is paid to another party. You may collect money if the event   insured against occurs, otherwise your premium is consumed during the contract   term.
              Covered call writing is the other strategy we   occasionally employ. Here our primary objective is to collect a premium   from a third party in exchange for giving them the right to purchase the stock   from us at a stated price for a stated period of time.
              There are myriad strategies and possibilities   which can occur to make these hedging strategies exceedingly complex. Such   discussions, however, are way beyond the scope and purpose of this letter and   don’t relate to our relatively simple hedging transactions.
              As illustrated by broad investment market indices,   rising domestic inflation has taken its toll on our domestic stock and bond   markets while precious metals, strategic minerals, and real estate have   benefited in this environment. These six-month results clearly indicate the   benefit of broad portfolio diversification which continues to represent the   cornerstone of our current investment approach.